Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Elghembri v. Muhammad
as 3:2023cv03328
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Chaplain Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El Gammal v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv03589
Petitioner:
Ahmed Mohammed El Gammal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
AL-HAJ v. KIRBY
as 1:2016cv08393
Petitioner:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Respondent:
MARK KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohamed v. Isacc et al
as 2:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed
Defendant:
Isacc and Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littleton v. Miller et al
as 5:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
William Littleton
Defendant:
M Miller, Ahmed Mohamed, Peggy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Al-Haj
as 15-3081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AHMED MOHAMMED-ABDULL AL-HAJ
Mohammed-Abdullah-Omar Al-Haj v. USA
as 5:2015cv04849
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ahmed Mohammed-Abdullah-Omar Al-Haj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JEFF GRONDOLSKY, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zakaria Al-Baidany, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-5356
Petitioner - Appellee:
Zakaria Al-Baidany, Detainee and Ahmed Mohammed Hassi Al Rammah, as Next Friend of Zakaria Al-Baidany
Respondent - Appellant:
Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, Leon E. Panetta, United States Secretary, United States Department of Defense, John Smith, Jr., Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
