Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Johnson v. USA
as 7:2016cv00297
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marner v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv02678
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner
Defendant:
Terry (I) Jones, Terry Jones, Daniel (I) Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marner et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv02214
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner, Nevaeh Marner and Mackenzie White
Defendant:
Alan Johnson, Justin Flowers, Kim Simao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Barry Johnson
as 15-7384
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BARRY ALAN JOHNSON
Johnson et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05019
Plaintiff:
Christene Lynn Johnson and Todd Alan Johnson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason Johnson v. Freddie Arwood
as 14-7199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON A. JOHNSON, a/k/a Jason Alan Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDDIE ARWOOD, Chief, in his individual and official capacity, CHARLESTON CHAPMAN, Officer, in his individual and official capacity and RODNEY HOPE, Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity
Johnson et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv05607
Plaintiff:
Alan Johnson and Stacey Urner
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Quality Loan Services Corp. of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 3:2014cv02025
Plaintiff:
ALAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, DR. WOODWARD, MD, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ritscher et al
as 5:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Johnson
Defendant:
Rachel Marie Ritscher, J.D. Leatherwood, Ashley L. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pinney et al
as 5:2013ct03324
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Johnson
Defendant:
J.S. Pinney, A. Freeman, W.R. Whitted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
