Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Guapo-Villegas v. City of Soledad et al
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Martin Guapo-Villegas
Defendant:
City of Soledad, Alejandro Castillo and Mustafa Yasin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alejandro Castillo v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10466
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Castillo
Defendant:
TMobile USA, Inc., Broadspire Services, Inc., Broadspire Insurance Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Castillo Cardenas v. Garland
as 22-1806
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO CASTILLO CARDENAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Castillo et al v. K.B. Wallworx Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Castillo and Gary Humm
Defendant:
K.B. Wallworx Incorporated an Arizona Corporation doing business as K.B. Appliance, Kenneth Charles Bruning, Lori Ann Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castillo-Trevino v. Garland
as 21-60820
Petitioner:
Alejandro Castillo-Trevino
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Alejandro Padilla
as 20-10257
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO CASTILLO PADILLA, AKA Alejandro Castillo-Padilla, AKA Alejandro Castro Padilla
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
