Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Lopez v. GNLV Corp.
as 2:2024cv00591
Petitioner:
Alejandro Lopez
Respondent:
GNLV Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. GNLV Corp
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Lopez
Defendant:
GNLV Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mario Lopez v. Brian Williams, et al
as 23-15469
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO ALEJANDRO LOPEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Winkelman v. Austin Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eli Winkelman
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, City Of Austin, Ryan Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Lopez
as 21-40251
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Lopez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Social Restaurant Group, LLC v. Bramson et al
as 1:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Social Restaurant Group, LLC
Defendant:
Alejandro Lopez, Christal Bramson, Jad Bouchebel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SOCIAL RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC v. BRAMSON et al
as 1:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
SOCIAL RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO LOPEZ, CHRISTAL BRAMSON, JAD BOUCHEBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez-Valenzuela v. Wilkinson
as 21-9526
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO LOPEZ-VALENZUELA
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, United States Attorney General
Ag-Mart Produce Incorporated v. Lorex Produce LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Enok Aristiga Ayala, Francisco Alejandro Lopez Rodriguez, Claudia Mireya Armenta Aguilar and others
Plaintiff:
Ag-Mart Produce Incorporated doing business as Santa Sweets Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
