Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Ramos v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ramos
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Ramos Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Ramos Restaurant, Inc. d/b/a Ramos Mexican Restaurant, d/b/a Ramos Restaurant, and d/b/a Ramos Sports Bar, Alejandro Ramos and Marisol Ramos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ramos v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2020cv01546
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 and Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ramos v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2019cv09802
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Louisiana, State of Louisiana, Officer Rogers, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Raul-Alejandro Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Drury Hotels Company LLC
as 6:2019cv00408
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ramos
Defendant:
Drury Hotels Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alejandro Ramos v. William Barr
as 19-70122
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO RAMOS, AKA Alejandro Perez Ramos
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Marlon Johnson v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv02523
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Matthew Baltierra and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. 2014 Dodge Ram 1500, VIN 3C6RRBFTXEG234098
as 1:2018cv01876
Defendant:
2014 Dodge Ram 1500, VIN 3C6RRBFTXEG234098
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Alejandro Ramos-Balderrama
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
