Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 369
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1391
Defendant / Appellee: STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH, DENVER BIBLE CHURCH, ROBERT A. ENYART and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Regional Home Health Care, Inc v. Alex Azar, II, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3239
Defendant / Appellee: Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, NCI Information Systems, Inc., an NCI Company, doing business as AdvanceMed Corporation and Does 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant: Regional Home Health Care, Inc.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv03032
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Blume v. Azar
as 5:2020cv03684
Plaintiff: Patricia G. Blume
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Asapansa-Johnson Walker v. Becerra
as 20-3580
Defendant / Appellant: Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker and Cecilia Gentili
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al
as 20-1377
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROBERT A. ENYART, JOEY RHOADS, COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellant: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, GOVERNOR JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor, State of Colorado and JILL HUNSAKER RYAN, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Amicus Curiae: INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS, EQUAL PARTNERS IN FAITH and others
TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE v. AZAR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02902
Defendant: MICHAEL D. WEAHKEE, ALEX M. AZAR, II and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Defendant: THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS, CHATTANOOGA C.A.R.E.S. doing business as CEMPA COMMUNITY CARE, MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES, INC. and others
Petitioner: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv02876
Plaintiff: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II, CHAD WOLF, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
St. Francis Hospital, et al v. Azar We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5097
Plaintiff / Appellant: ST. JOHN MEDICAL CENTER, AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX M. AZAR, II

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?