Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Prince v. Arndt et al
as 1:2020cv05847
Defendant:
Chariot Tow Company, Unknown Tow Employee, Robert Arndt and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Baldwin (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00715
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bennett and Stephen Alexander Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09768
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ALEXANDER BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cordova v. Gallegos et al
as 1:2019cv00785
Defendant:
Officer Alexander Bennett, New Mexico State Police Department, Officer Joseph Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennett v. Holder
as 14-774
Petitioner:
Lennox Alexander Bennett
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Bennett v. Camargo Trucking
as 1:2012at00502
Plaintiff:
Marc Alexander Bennett
Defendant:
Camargo Trucking, Luis G. Camargo, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Bennett v. Camargo Trucking et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Marc Alexander Bennett
Defendant:
Camargo Trucking , Luis Camargo , National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
