Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Ministerial Trust of Nation of Agapes et al v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2026cv02143
Plaintiff:
Ministerial Trust of Nation of Agapes and Amanda Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Clerk, Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv13439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Overbaugh et al v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv11592
Plaintiff:
Richard Nelson Overbaugh, Eric Joseph Adams, Angelo Agostini and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Perkins et al
as 2:2025cv00926
Plaintiff:
Terrance Alexander Davis
Defendant:
Perkins, Wendy, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Michael Davis
as 25-5307
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER DAVIS
Davis v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00424
Plaintiff:
Alexander Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas Davis, III v. United States
as 24-2992
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Davis v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-21
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRENCE ALEXANDER DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
