Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Davis v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-21
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRENCE ALEXANDER DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GITTERE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Alexander Davis and Alexandre Davis
Defendant:
Yellowstone County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20188
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15763
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas Davis, III v. United States
as 22-2093
Petitioner:
Thomas Alexander Davis, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Amerisure Insurance Company et al v. Amason & Associates Inc et al
as 7:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amason & Associates Inc, Core Tuscaloosa 519-611 Red Drew LLC, Core Campus LLC d/b/a Core Spaces and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv01254
Plaintiff:
Alexander Davis, Jr and Alexander O. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
