Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Figueroa et al v. Travelers Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 6:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tanisha N Figueroa
Defendant:
Travelers Property and Casualty Insurance Company, DOT Transportation, Inc. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Darrion Alexander Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond Ford, Jr. v. Jerry Mile
as 15-6627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ALEXANDER FORD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY A. MILES, DDS, DR. HAYES, Dentist, C. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MR. TURNER, LPN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Raymond Ford, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7786
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND ALEXANDER FORD, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Kurt Luna v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 09-5523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT F. LUNA
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, JENKINS & WYNNE, INC., STAN MCNABB FORD and others
Defendant:
YET TO BE IDENTIFIED EMPLOYEES OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY, YET TO BE IDENTIFIED EMPLOYEES OF ALEXANDER FORD, YET TO BE IDENTIFIED EMPLOYEES OF STAN MCNABB FORD and others
Kurt Luna v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 09-5469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT F. LUNA
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, JENKINS & WYNNE, INC., STAN MCNABB FORD and others
Defendant:
YET TO BE IDENTIFIED EMPLOYEES OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY, YET TO BE IDENTIFIED EMPLOYEES OF ALEXANDER FORD, YET TO BE IDENTIFIED EMPLOYEES OF STAN MCNABB FORD and others
Ford v. Johnson
as 2:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Ford, Jr.
Respondent:
Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Ryan et al
as 2:2008cv02363
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alexander Ford
Respondent:
Arizona Attorney General, State of and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
