Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Battams v. Cohen et al
as 2:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Steven Battams
Defendant:
Peter A. Cohen, Willie C. Bogan, Chris Nolet and others
Richfield v. Polarityte et al
as 2:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Marc Richfield
Defendant:
Polarityte, David B. Seaburg, Jacob Alexander Patterson and others
Warren v. Ray et al
as 3:2020cv06136
Defendant:
Sherry Ray, Reco Rowe, Division of Alcohol and Substance of Social and Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrmell Rashadd Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv01614
Petitioner:
Jaysen Alexander Patterson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PATTERSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2020cv12113
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER PATTERSON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Calderin et al
as 2:2019cv00784
Plaintiff:
Jaysen Alexander Patterson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Julio Calderin and Brian Williams Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Aranas et al
as 2:2018cv02191
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Patricia Wilson, F Oakman and others
Plaintiff:
Jaysen Alexander Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2018cv00957
Petitioner:
Leverne Alexander Patterson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Patterson v. Taskforce for the Homless et al
as 1:2016cv03562
Plaintiff:
Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant:
Taskforce for the Homless and Atlanta Union Mission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Magic City et al
as 1:2016cv03417
Plaintiff:
Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant:
Magic City, Blue Flame Lounge - USA, Oxny Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
