Cases 1 - 10 of 37
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hernandez-Lopez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
Alexis Hernandez-Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hernandez-Lopez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv12075
Plaintiff:
Alexis Hernandez-Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hernandez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv10018
Plaintiff:
Alexis Hernandez
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00280
Petitioner:
Alexis Hernandez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01460
Plaintiff:
Alexis Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Hernandez Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-6422
Petitioner:
DANI ALEXIS HERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Portillo v. Garland
as 21-384
Petitioner:
RUDY ALEXIS HERNANDEZ-PORTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
