Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alfred Evans v. Charles Lockett
as 19-5062
Respondent / Appellee:
Charles L. Lockett, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alfred Evans
EVANS v. LOCKETT
as 1:2017cv02619
Petitioner:
ALFRED EVANS
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Cole III et al
as 3:2016cv01790
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Elrige Cole III, Francisco Rodriguez, Maria Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Evans v. USA
as 1:2016cv00264
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Alfred Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: John Evans
as 16-12276
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ALFRED EVANS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Evans v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv01941
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officers John Doe 1 and John Doe 2, Police Officer J McGuiness and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley Park Tenants Association et al v. Fair Housing Development Fund, Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv06225
Plaintiff:
All Tenants of Stanley Park Apartments, Caroline Rafenski, Cruz Antonio Rosario and others
Defendant:
Julian Castro, Rev. Alfred Evans, Fair Housing Development Fund, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
EVANS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64531
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EVANS and MARY EVANS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2007cv01282
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EVANS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Breeden v. City of Brookline et al
as 1:2007cv11555
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Breeden
Defendant:
City of Brookline, Brookline Police Department, Daniel C. O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
