Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Alicia Butler v. Georgia Department of Corr., et al
as 19-10249
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, MARTY ALLEN, Individually and as the Warden of Georgia State Prison, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALICIA BUTLER
Butler v. The Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00170
Plaintiff:
Alicia Butler
Defendant:
The Georgia Department of Corrections , The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia , Georgia Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Butler v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv11449
Plaintiff:
Alicia Butler
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing , Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert v. Landry et al
as 5:2012cv01968
Plaintiff:
Stanley Robert
Defendant:
Lori Landry and Alicia Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert v. Landry et al
as 6:2012cv01968
Plaintiff:
Stanley Robert
Defendant:
Lori Landry and Alicia Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Londo v. Frank Ellis, et al
as 10-30685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES LONDO
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK ELLIS, LOUIS ACKAL, NANCY DUNNING and others
Londo v. Ellis et al
as 6:2010cv00750
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Londo
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Jack Cliffton, Johnny Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Londo v. Ellis et al
as 6:2009cv02007
Plaintiff:
Anthony Londo
Defendant:
Frank Ellis, Louis Ackal, Nancy Dunning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Londo v. Ellis et al
as 2:2009cv07365
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Londo
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Jack Cliffton, Johnny Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
