Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lindsay Cooper, et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.
as 15-56424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDSAY R. COOPER, JAMES R. SUTTON, KIM GIESEKING and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AKA TEPCO
Real Party In Interest:
SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM J. FALLON, Admiral, THOMAS B. FARGO, Admiral, GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN and others
Stockdale et al v. Logan et al
as 3:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Stockdale , Wayne A Betchel , Gary W. Summers and others
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Logan, Allen Logan and John Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Logan v. New Castle County Delaware et al
as 1:2012cv01708
Plaintiff:
Matthew Allen Logan
Defendant:
New Castle County Delaware and Steven J. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Romalis Gray
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Morgan County Correctional Complex, J Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 8:2011cv01075
Plaintiff:
Allen Logan
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company and Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products N.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOGAN et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82593
Plaintiff:
FLOYD ALLEN LOGAN and EUDORA LOGAN
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BANKS et al
as 2:2007cv66363
Plaintiff:
GLADYS M. BANKS, HARRY J. BANKS, MILFORD L. BARNES, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
