Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Moore et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04808
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Allen Potter and Linda Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv12992
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN POTTER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. Salmonson et al
as 9:2018cv00145
Petitioner:
Allen Potter
Respondent:
James Salmonson and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen Potter v. Martin Frink, et al
as 12-35907
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN POTTER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTIN FRINK and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Potter v. Frink et al
as 9:2011cv00151
Petitioner:
Allen Potter
Respondent:
Martin Frink and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knows His Gun et al v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Knows His Gun , Darryl Lewis Frost , Jason Jay Chiefstick and others
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
POTTER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03618
Plaintiff:
ALLEN POTTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burlington Insurance Company v. Superior Nationwide Logistics, et al
as 10-20666
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BURLINGTON INSURANCE CO
Defendant - Appellant:
SUPERIOR NATIONWIDE LOGISTICS, LTD., TOBY ALLEN POTTER, TA, TA POTTER MANAGEMENT L.L.C. and others
Burlington Insurance Company v. Superior Nationwide Logistics, Ltd. et al
as 4:2009cv02424
Plaintiff:
Burlington Insurance Company
Defendant:
Superior Nationwide Logistics, Ltd., Toby Allen Potter, T.A., Potter Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
