Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Demetrius Hill v. C. O. Crum
as 12-6705
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CRUM
Defendant:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, MR. STRICKLAND, Associate Warden, MR. WILSON, Captain and others
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ALLRED v. USA
as 1:2012cv00014
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JUSTUS LEE ALLRED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ebel v. Allred et al
as 5:2011ct03245
Plaintiff:
Peter M. Ebel
Defendant:
N. Allred, Tracy Johns, Debra Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John DeGroote Services, LLC et al v. Harbach et al
as 1:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
John DeGroote Services, LLC , John DeGroote and Bearingpoint, Inc. Liquidating Trust
Defendant:
F. Edwin Harbach , Albert L. Lord , Roderick C. McGeary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ingram et al v. Haynes et al
as 5:2010ct03085
Plaintiff:
Billy Wade Ingram, Brian K. Hargrove, Matthew J. Cuthrell and others
Defendant:
Grady J. Haynes, Shelia Mitchell and Robert C. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN THE MATTER OF MILDRED ANN ALLRED
as 1:2010mc00030
Respondent:
IN THE MATTER OF MILDRED ANN ALLRED
US v. Jimmy Allred
as 09-7293
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMY LEE ALLRED
Harris v. O'Brien et al
as 7:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, David Allred, S. Jerrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Demetrius Hill v. Terry O'Brien
as 09-6823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, MR. STRICKLAND, Associate Warden, MR. WILSON, Captain and others
Defendant - None:
COUNSELOR PULIVAR, COUNSELOR MULLINS, MS. HALL, Case Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
