Cases 21 - 30 of 3,283
Duffy v. Amazon.com.ca, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Duffy
Defendant:
Amazon.com.ca, Inc., Amazon.com Sales, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Zhang v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Ryan Zhang
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In Re: Request from Germany
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Respondent:
Nokia Technologies Oy, Alcatel Lucent SAS, Nokia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Account Receivable
Jackson v. FKG Logistics, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Dynasty S. Jackson
Defendant:
FKG Logistics, LLC, Kazoubi Said, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WFR IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
WFR IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
