Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BRAGG v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Bragg and RONALD J. BRAGG
Other:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM LLC and AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AMAZON HOME SERVICES, INC.
Cross Defendant:
AN LAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LUGO v. AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC,
as 2:2022cv02994
Plaintiff:
CRAIG LUGO
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Becker v. Amazon.com et al
as 1:2019cv01426
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Pickup Points, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Becker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sumra v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Saad Sumra
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com.dedc LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 1:2018cv00276
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love v. Weecoo(TM) et al
as 1:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Irvin R. Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Weecoo(TM), Panda Town, Amazon.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyles v. Amazon.com.dedc, LLC
as 1:2017cv03833
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lyles
Defendant:
Amazon.com.dedc, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAZI et al v. AMAZON.COM, INC et al
as 1:2017cv13147
Plaintiff:
CENI GAZI and DENISA GAZI
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. , LIBERTY VENTURE I. LP , JOHN DOE and others
Cross_claimant:
LIBERTY VENTURE I. LP
Cross_defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweatt v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sweatt
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Amazon.com LLC , Amazon Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
