Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Jonathan Davis, et al v. Pro Musicians Local 47, et al
as 14-56567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN DAVIS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, PHILIP EVANS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and MINDY BALL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
PROFESSIONAL MUSICIANS LOCAL 47, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA and PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Madsen v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO/CLC, Local 24
as 5:2013cv02519
Plaintiff:
Linda Madsen
Defendant:
American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO/CLC, Local 24
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.
as 13-1720
Amicus Curiae:
Hank Green, Anaheim Ballet, Raymond T. Nimmer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Comedy Partners, Viacom Inc., Country Music Television, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
YouTube LLC and Google Inc.
Petitioner:
Football Association Premier League Limited, Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Murbo Music Publishing, Inc. and others
Sony BMG Music, et al v. Tenenbaum
as 12-2146
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, a Delaware Corporation, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOEL TENENBAUM
Interested Party:
NASHVILLE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, SONGWRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
American Federation of Musicians for the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. Adams et al
as 3:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
American Federation of Musicians for the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Jimmy L. Adams and Jimmy Adams Media LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
American Federation of Musicians for the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. Curb Entertainment International Corporation
as 3:2012cv00898
Plaintiff:
American Federation of Musicians for the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Curb Entertainment International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Jonathan Davis et al v. Professional Musicians Local 47 et al
as 8:2012cv00960
Defendant:
American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles County and Professional Musicians Local 47
Plaintiff:
Mindy Ball, Jonathan Davis and Philip Evans
United States, et al v. Tenenbaum
as 10-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, a Delaware Corporation, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL TENENBAUM
Interested Party:
NASHVILLE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, SONGWRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS and others
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Joel Tenenbaum
as 10-1947
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, a Deleware Corporation, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOEL TENENBAUM
Amicus Curiae:
NASHVILLE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, SONGWRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum
as 10-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, a Deleware Corporation, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL TENENBAUM
Amicus Curiae:
THE NASHVILLE SONGWRITERS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL, SONGWRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
