Cases 31 - 40 of 96
De Los Santos v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK)
as 1:2020cv11103
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
Jose De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Rodriguez v. Amtrak, et al
as 20-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PERRY, AMTRAK and C. CHAVES
Amanda Jones v. Amtrak, et al
as 20-15279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, AMTRAK and SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT
D'rayfield Shipman v. Amtrak
as 20-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
Amtrak
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D'Rayfield Kary-Khame Shipman
William Robinson v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
as 19-2928
Defendant / Appellee:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP, DBA Amtrak
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBINSON
Williams v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 19-2472
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. Santiago, Amtrak Police Officer ; Badge No. 307; in his official capacity, National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), John Doe 1, an as yet unidentified Amtrak Police Officer; in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent Williams
Rodriguez v. Amtrak, et al
as 19-2103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PERRY, AMTRAK and C. CHAVES
In re: Rodriguez, et al
as 19-2098
Respondent:
AMTRAK, C. CHAVES and J. PERRY
Petitioner:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Rodolfo Rodriguez v. San Antonio Police Department, et al
as 19-50539
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al. and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., doing business as Amtrak
Barca v. CSX Freight Railroad, Inc., et al
as 19-1570
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, (The "T"), OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL APARTMENTS, INC., AMTRAK COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY BARCA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
