Cases 11 - 20 of 678
Dang v. Casselberry Police Department
as 6:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Mailin Thi Dang
Defendant:
Casselberry Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Melnychuk-Beselt et al v. Bickerton Dang LLLP et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ronda Melnychuk-Beselt and Mark Beselt
Defendant:
Bickerton Dang LLLP, James J. Bickerton, Charles Dang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Elas v. Prince et al
as 2:2024cv01050
Petitioner:
CAMERON WYATT, Pham Duy Anh Dang and ARMAN REYES
Plaintiff:
Antonie Elas and TREY GREENE
Defendant:
ZAC PRINCE, FLORI MARQUEZ, Amit Cheela and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dang v. Matthias et al
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Mailin Thi Dang
Defendant:
Cheyanna Matthias, Kaitlin Booth, Michelle Bregoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
P&B Marine, LLC
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
P&B Marine, LLC
Claimant:
Ruby Dang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Dang v. Orlando Health Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women & Babies
as 6:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Mailin Thi Dang
Defendant:
Orlando Health Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women & Babies and CEO David Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
