Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Wolters v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03623
Petitioner:
Andrew Wolters
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Robert Wolter
as 23-1848
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Robert Andrew Wolter v. Metropolitan Detention Center Los Angeles
as 2:2023cv03207
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolters v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv03361
Petitioner:
Andrew Walters and Andrew Wolters
Respondent:
Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wolter v. Grady County of
as 5:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant:
Grady County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Wolter v. Fed. Public Defender's Office, et al
as 22-1566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Public Defender's Office, Edward Werner and Jason J. Tupman
Robert Wolter v. Federal Public Defender's Office, et al
as 22-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Public Defender's Office, Jason J. Tupman and Edward Werner
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW WOLTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. LOVETT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wolter v. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant:
Federal Public Defenders Office, Jason J. Tupman and Edward Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolter v. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Federal Public Defenders Office, Edward Werner and Jason J. Tupman
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
