Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01479
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guzman-Zavaleta v. Blanche
as 26-1886
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GUZMAN-ZAVALETA
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guzman v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv01159
Plaintiff:
Angel Guzman
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guzman-Arauz, et al. v. Bondi
as 25-5347
Petitioner:
MODESTO ANTONIO GUZMAN-ARAUZ, MARYSOLINA DE LOS ANGELES GRANADOS-GOMEZ, MARYSOLINA DE LOS ANGELES GUZMAN-GRANADOS and others
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States v. Guzman-Aviles
as 25-3150
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANGEL GUZMAN-AVILES
Guzman et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2025cv01375
Plaintiff:
Yarieliz Guzman and Angel Guzman
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYPD LT. Ryan Oshea, NYPD Det. Jacqueline Demerest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miguel Guzman-Torralva v. James R. McHenry, III
as 24-4030
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GUZMAN-TORRALVA
United States v. Guzman-Aviles
as 24-3109
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANGEL GUZMAN-AVILES
Guzman v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Guzman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guzman v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08639
Plaintiff:
Angel Guzman
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.