Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gezelle Guillard, et al v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEZELLE GUILLARD
Plaintiff:
JOHN PETERSON and TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM PYLE, CANDY RUSSELL, DAVE YOST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hall et al v. Putnam County Commission et al
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Angela Hall and Erik Hall
Defendant:
Putnam County Commission, Deputy Sheriff Heather D. Grimmett and Deputy Sheriff B.W. Pauley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillard et al v. Pyle et al
as 2:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Gezelle Guillard, John Peterson and Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Justin Elekes, Kayla Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton, Carolyn Banks, Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Intervenor:
United States
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
