Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hunter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tonya Ann Hunter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Warren Giddings v. Correctional Officer Charriez
as 23-6121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHARRIEZ, MCTC, Hagerstown, MD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GRUBBS, MCTC, Hagerstown, MD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARGER, MCTC, Hagerstown, MD and others
Carter v. Dusnik et al
as 8:2022cv02605
Plaintiff:
Charlie Carter, III
Defendant:
Ashley Dusnik, Ed Brodsky, Anne Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hunter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00498
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Hunter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Hunter et al
as 3:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Unknown Spouse of Leigh Ann Hunter and Leigh Ann Hunter
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hunter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Hunter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Hunter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Hunter and Nathan Hunter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01417
Plaintiff:
Brooke Ann Hunter
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
