Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Brogdon v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Craig Bruce Brogdon
Defendant:
Unknown, M. Anthony Baker, John J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brogdon v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv05953
Plaintiff:
Craig Bruce Brogdon and Randall Larry Thaxton
Defendant:
Unknown, M. Anthony Baker, Susan Treadaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baker
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANTHONY BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker et al v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08186
Plaintiff:
Shepell Baker and Anthony Baker
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker and Ashley N. Baker
Defendant:
UA White, Captain Taylor, Amy Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Baker v. Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-2031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Baker v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv01520
Petitioner:
Marcus Anthony Baker
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. FLORES
as 3:2023cv01948
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BAKER
Respondent:
R FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
