Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03391
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CHAPMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47531
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHORT v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2017cv04544
Plaintiff:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Defendant:
ADAMS, NEIL, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Davita Healthcare Partners Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05225
Defendant:
Mitchel Bolloci, Michael Bollock, Nurse Preseporne Camara and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Nasrin Yousefmorrowatti
Unknown:
Brian J Robbins and Kevin A Seely
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Chapman v. Tortorigi Hauling Inc
as 2:2016cv01239
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chapman
Defendant:
Tortorigi Hauling Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Chapman et al
as 1:2015cv02285
Plaintiff:
Rickey Jones
Defendant:
Mark Anthony Chapman and USA Truck, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv07728
Plaintiff:
Tina Chapman and Anthony Chapman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
