Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00204
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. William Davis, Jr.
as 23-4174
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY DAVIS, JR.
Davis v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 7:2022cv03991
Plaintiff:
Larry Louis Anthony Davis
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Spartanburg County, Sheriff Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Davis v. John Doe et al
as 5:2022ct03154
Plaintiff:
Keymonty LeRay Anthony Davis
Defendant:
Sgt. John Doe and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 6:2019cv00542
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chisholm et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03383
Plaintiff:
Anthony Espinosa, Renate Lawson, Jo Ann Smith and others
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03390
Plaintiff:
Brenna (I) Myers-Forquer, Donald Haggart, Bernard Dickerson and others
Defendant:
Chemguard, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2018cv01527
Defendant:
Unknown and Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
