Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff: Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant: Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: HEATH
as 2:2022cv02688
Petitioner: IN RE: ANTHONY HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANN v. HEATH
as 7:2018cv00050
Plaintiff: JOHN ALAN MANN, JR
Defendant: ANTHONY HEATH, JEREMY MARQUEZ, KYLE LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv04221
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HEATH
Defendant: CYNTHIA LINK, J. LOZAR and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOREHEAD v. HEATH et al
as 7:2017cv00127
Plaintiff: TERRY LENN MOREHEAD
Defendant: ANTHONY HEATH, JOHN DOE and LENDER BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02376
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Heath
Defendant: AbbVie, Inc. , AbbVie Products LLC and Abbott Laboratories, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooks v. Berrien County, Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2016cv00181
Plaintiff: JIMMY KYLE HOOKS
Defendant: BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA and ANTHONY HEATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Heath et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00036
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Green
Defendant: Anthony Heath and Central MS Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLAND v. WILLIAMSON et al
as 7:2015cv00160
Plaintiff: ISRAEL TIMOTHY RUTLAND
Defendant: CASEY D WILLIAMSON, ROBERT BRANNEN, FLOYD COSPELICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. Berrien County Georgia et al
as 7:2012cv00156
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE BERRY
Defendant: Berrien County Georgia, Berrien County Sheriff's Department, Anthony Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?