Cases 1 - 10 of 189
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flammang v. Portillo et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Abby Flammang
Defendant:
Angel Portillo, Anthony Martin, Aden Heyman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martin v. McElrath
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin
Defendant:
Brenda McElrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Kelly Anthony Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gomez v. Sage
as 1:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Anthony Martin Gomez
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR. and CHESTERFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
