Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Heard et al v. Finco et al
as 2:2013cv11342
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard, William Johnson, Jamero Moses and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin and Brad Purves
Nelson v. Harvey et al
as 2:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Shannon Harvey, W. B. Melton, Ethan Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Tews
as 3:2012cv05308
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Nelson
Respondent:
Randy L. Tews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Nelson v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Steve Outlaw, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Defendant:
R. Clemmons, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, S. DeCoursey, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Hughes, CO-II, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Nelson v. Stolc
as 2:2012cv00968
Petitioner:
Darien Anthony Nelson
Respondent:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United State Of America v. Nelson
as 1:2012cv02522
Respondent:
United State Of America
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nelson v. Stolc
as 4:2012cv01554
Petitioner:
Darien Anthony Nelson
Respondent:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv01011
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Nelson
Respondent:
Randy J. Davis and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Campbell et al
as 1:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Kristen Campbell, Stone County Correctional Facility and Mississippi Dept. of Corrections Parole and Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , Greg Harmon , Steve Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
