Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00785
Petitioner:
Vincent Anthony Ramirez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bruce Merryman v. TX Board of Pardons and Parole, et al
as 19-50585
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY RAMIREZ, Parole Voter, San Antonio Board Office, FRED SOLIZ, Parole Voter, San Antonio Board Office, DAVID GUTIERREZ, Director, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE RANDOL MERRYMAN
Ramirez v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv03315
Defendant:
Andy Crump, Ron Davis and Ron Chapman
Plaintiff:
Marco Anthony Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merryman v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 5:2019cv00333
Plaintiff:
Bruce Randol Merryman
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Anthony Ramirez, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Juan Higareda-Cervantes
as 19-50026
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN ANTONIO HIGAREDA-CERVANTES, also known as Anthony Ramirez, also known as Juan Higareda, also known as Juan Antonio Higareda, also known as Ivan Lava
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nelson v. Collier et al
as 5:2018cv01145
Defendant:
Fred Solis, Brian Collier, Pamela Thielke and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Anthony Ramirez
as 1:2018cv04352
In_re:
Anthony Ramirez
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kennebrew v. Amarillo Parole Office et al
as 2:2018cv00039
Defendant:
Charles Shipman, Amarillo Parole Office and Anthony Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Keith Druzzel Kennebrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Augustin Ramirez et al v. Vicente Martinez et al
as 5:2017cv02211
Defendant:
DOES, Angel Juarez, Vicente Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Agustin Ramirez, Anthony Ramirez and Agustin Ramirez, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
