Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Dailey v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Dailey
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Turnkey Health
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
Turnkey Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Gould
as 3:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Andrew R. Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 3:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board, LB, MJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Buckner et al
as 4:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
Buckner and Wynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Price
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Washoe County Jail, Jennifer Raines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. County of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
William Howard Ward
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Undersheriff and Acting Sheriff Kelly Martinez,, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Price
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Reno Fire Inspector and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. DeVore et al
as 4:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
DeVore, Lang, Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
