Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Troy A. Rhodes v. Sherman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00494
Defendant: Stu Sherman
Plaintiff: Troy Anthony Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Sherman
as 1:2014at00236
Defendant: S Sherman
Plaintiff: Troy Anthony Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weiters et al v. Fayette County et al
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff: Dwight Weiters
Defendant: Fayette County, Robert M. Crawford, Unknown Magistrate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes et al v. Indiana Department of Child Services
as 2:2012cv02307
Plaintiff: Anthony Rhodes and Linda Kay Rhodes
Defendant: Indiana Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (b) Bankruptcy Matters (other)
Whitehead v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2011cv00105
Plaintiff: Detrick D. Whitehead
Defendant: Anthony Rhodes and Fayette County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes et al v. Scotbuilt Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03841
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Rhodes , Anthony Rhodes , Kionna Rhodes and others
Defendant: Scotbuilt Homes, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mark Rhodes v. Richard Wathen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-10892
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK ANTHONY RHODES
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD WATHEN, Warden, MICHAEL GRIDER, Head of Maintenance Department and JESUS ESPINOSA, Risk Manager
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02061
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Troy Rhodes v. Derral Adam
as 10-15524
Petitioner - Appellant: TROY ANTHONY RHODES
Respondent - Appellee: DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00546
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?