Cases 1 - 10 of 25
ROBINSON v. DALISMA et al.
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Defendant:
DR. DALISMA, ROXY PLAYSO, NURSE ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
CASEY v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2023cv04314
Plaintiff:
RAASHAUN CASEY and DJ ENVY
Defendant:
ANTHONY ROBINSON, TONY THE CLOSER, "ABC CORPORATIONS" 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
TIMKO et al v. NSPA LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01307
Defendant:
YADWINDER SINGH, BALJINDER KAUR, HIMANSHU BHATIA and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI TIMKO, ANTHONY ROBINSON and STEPHANIE DARNELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HOFFMAN v. WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
HOWARD R. HOFFMAN
Defendant:
WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, ANTHONY ROBINSON, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Anthony Robinson
as 22-1600
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
USA v. Anthony Robinson
as 21-1667
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY ROBINSON, a/k/a ANTHONY HARRISON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Todd Robinson v. Warden Allegheny County Jail
as 20-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON, a/k/a Todd Anthony Glover
ROBINSON v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv00376
Defendant:
HARPER
Plaintiff:
ROBINSON
Petitioner:
TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON and TODD ANTHONY GLOVER
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00905
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 1:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
