Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Wilson v. Giangrand
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Robert Giangrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jaclyn Hughes, Emily Crawford, Monique Danene Delgado and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wilson v. JCI
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
JCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. CRST-The Transportation Solution-West
as 3:2023cv05990
Plaintiff:
Jamalh Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
CRST-The Transportation Solution-West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Supervisor Over the Medical Department et al
as 4:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Supervisor Over the Medical Department, Supervisor Over the Dietary Department and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14394
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamalh Wilson v. Yakima Police Department, et al
as 23-35604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMALH ANTHONY WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
YAKIMA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT RITCHIE FOWLER and CITY OF YAKIMA
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03814
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADKINS et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
TODD ADKINS, TEMITOPE AMUSA, JULIO AVILA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
