Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET. Case transferred to Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04195
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Antoine Thomas v. Edward D. Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00947
Plaintiff: Antoine Thomas
Defendant: Edward D. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00915
Plaintiff: Antoine Thomas
Defendant: Edward D. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as MA/1:14-cv-13981
Plaintiff: Antoine Thomas
Defendant: Fresenius Management SE, Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc. and others
THOMAS v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv06419
Plaintiff: ANTOINE THOMAS
Defendant: NORTHERN STATE PRISON, PEREZ, COUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01878
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
THOMAS v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2010cv01855
Plaintiff: ANTOINE THOMAS
Defendant: LILLIAN FREEMAN, TIMOTHY BROWN, BRENDA TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Booker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv11520
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Raymond Booker
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?