Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LAPOTOSKY et al V. OLIVERIA, et al
as 2:2021cv05391
Defendant:
ANTONIO OLIVERIA, ANTONIO OLIVERIO, ANTONIO OLIVEIRA and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE LAPOTOSKY and TERRENCE LAPOTOSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVEIRA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15503
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO OLIVEIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliveira et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00612
Plaintiff:
Renee Oliveira and Antonio Oliveira
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLIVEIRA v. U.S. XPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv08541
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO OLIVEIRA
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC. , DON LYNN BARBEE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oliveira v. Colfax County et al
as 1:2017cv00620
Plaintiff:
Raul Antonio Oliveira
Defendant:
Gabriel E. Sandoval, Colfax County Board of County Commissioners, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliveira et al v. S-L Distribution Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01131
Plaintiff:
Antonio Oliveira , Melquisede Pulinario , Antonio Tavares and others
Defendant:
S-L Distribution Company, Inc. and S-L Routes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tavares et al v. S-L Distribution Co., Inc.
as 1:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tavares , Ito Mosso , Emanuel Tavares and others
Defendant:
S-L Distribution Co., Inc. and S-L Routes, LLC
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
S-L Routes, LLC and S-L Distribution Co., Inc.
Counterclaim_defendant:
Ito Mosso , Antonio Oliveira , Melquisede Pulinario and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Tavares et al v. S-L Distribution Co., Inc.
as 1:2013cv10316
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tavares , Ito Mosso , Emanuel Tavares and others
Defendant:
S-L Distribution Co., Inc. and S-L Routes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
