Cases 81 - 90 of 882
Leonard v. United States of America
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Biden Administration, President JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., U.S. PRESIDENT, AKA Joseph A. Biden, AKA Joseph Robinette Biden, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re Subpoenas to Apple, Inc.
as 5:2023mc80325
Respondent:
Apple, Inc.
Petitioner:
Element Capital Commercial Co. PTE. Ltd
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 23-4027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Ph.D., MBA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Wescott v. Apple Inc
as 5:2023cv06254
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Wescott
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierre et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Lamartine Pierre, Mark Whitlock, Lynn-Marie Rodrigues and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Ex Parte Application of APPLE INC.; APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL; AND APPLE RETAIL GERMANY B.V. & CO. KG
as 4:2023mc80293
In Re:
Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International and Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG
Respondent:
RPX Corporation
Scramoge Technology Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
as 24-1079
Appellant:
SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.
Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
