Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Almeida v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2021cv07109
Plaintiff:
Nestor Almeida, Scott Seveland, Dan Henderson and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Daphne Pareas and Daniel Friend
Consolidated Defendant:
Apple Computer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAREAS et al v. Apple Computer, Inc.
as 3:2021cv07112
Plaintiff:
DAPHNE PAREAS and DANIEL FRIEND
Defendant:
Apple Computer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hagedorn et al v. IT's Leadership et al
as 3:2021cv01346
Defendant:
IT, World and United States Government, IT's Leadership and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Albert Hagedora, Hagedora Communications, Brian Albert Hagedorn and others
(PC) Major v. Newsom et al
as 1:2021cv00707
Defendant:
Screen Actor's Guild, Apple Computers, Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv06869
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannell v. The People of the State of Utah et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Defendant:
Apple Computer, Inc., Jocelyn Anderson Jobs and The People of the State of Utah
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Cannell, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Camarata v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02134
Defendant:
PORTLAND POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-5, Apple Pioneer Place, City of Portland and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Camarata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfonso Villalobos v. Metro PCS Corp., et al
as 17-55781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO VILLALOBOS
Defendant - Appellee:
METRO PCS CORP., T-MOBILE USA, INC. and APPLE COMPUTER, INC.
Alfonso Villalobos v. Metro PCS Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv00311
Defendant:
Apple Computers Inc., Metro PCS Corp. and TMobile USA
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Villalobos
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
