Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Aquila v. TGM Associates L.P.
as 1:2026cv03195
Plaintiff:
Andrew A. Aquila
Defendant:
TGM Associates L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
DeVine Jr. v. Cameron et al
as 1:2026cv04431
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont DeVine Jr. and Ronald DeVine Jr.
Defendant:
Drew Cameron, Aquila Protective Services, Josephine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sonderling v. AQUILA SERVICES CORPORATION d/b/a DENVER METRO PROTECTIVE SERVICES et al
as 1:2026cv04270
Defendant:
Charles Brandon Snively, AQUILA SERVICES CORPORATION d/b/a DENVER METRO PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Brandon Aquila and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Sonderling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Aquila v. TGM Associates L.P.
as 1:2026cv07413
Plaintiff:
Andrew A. Aquila
Defendant:
TGM Associates L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
172661 Canada Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv03541
Plaintiff:
172661 Canada Inc. dba Aquila Textiles
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection and Commissioner Rodney S. Scott
TGM Moorefield LLC v. Andrew Aquila
as 26-2049
Plaintiff:
TGM MOOREFIELD LLC
Defendant:
ANDREW A. AQUILA
Andrew Aquila v. Lorrie Taylor
as 26-1980
Plaintiff:
ANDREW A. AQUILA
Defendant:
LORRIE SINCLAIR TAYLOR, The Hon. in her official capacity as Chief Judge of the Loudoun County General District Court, GIOVANNA RAE BONAFEDE, individually, WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP and others
Aquila Pipeline Services LLC v. Flowchem LLC, et al.
as 4:2026cv05619
Plaintiff:
Aquila Pipeline Services, LLC
Defendant:
FLOWCHEM LLC, Lu-Chien Chou, Harrell Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Lesyshen v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv01827
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lesyshen
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Ryan Long, f/n/u Gates-Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
