Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travers v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv04816
Plaintiff:
Rishon Travers
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, Jahaira Lopez, Aramark Commissary/Food Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Aramark Commissary
as 2:2020cv01678
Plaintiff:
Willie Holland
Defendant:
Aramark Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Israel et al
as 4:2019cv00535
Defendant:
Mussaddqi, Bennet, Israel and others
Plaintiff:
Dadrain Dantwone Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Bexar County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv01088
Defendant:
Aramark Commissary Provider, Bexar County Jail and University Health Detention Services
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Holiday et al
as 4:2016cv00635
Plaintiff:
Tony Daniels
Defendant:
Doc Holiday, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility and Aramark Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Helder et al
as 5:2016cv05177
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hancock
Defendant:
Sheriff Helder, Randal Denzer, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Kane County Adult Judicial Center et al
as 1:2014cv02242
Plaintiff:
Douglas K. Powell
Defendant:
Kane County Adult Judicial Center, Patrick B. Perez and Aramark Commissary Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan et al v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2012cv07669
Plaintiff:
Wilson Pagan, Steven Lewis, Yusuf Dixon and others
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark Commissary and Food Services, Donna Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Aramark Commissary
as 2:2009cv02633
Plaintiff:
Calvin Davis
Defendant:
Aramark Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
