Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thrasher v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
Robin Thrasher
Defendant:
Aramark Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jason Hoffman v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-51205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON HOFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, LANA RHODES, Assistant Regional Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Parole Division, LISA CANIZALEZ, Parole Officer, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Parole Division and others
Brian Steele, et al v. Aramark Corp, et al
as 12-4009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN STEELE and JUDIKAELLE STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORP and ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL INC
Defendant - Appellant:
QUAD GRAPHICS INC
Brian Steele, et al v. Aramark Corp, et al
as 12-3942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN STEELE and JUDIKAELLE STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORP, ARAMARK UNIFORM CAREER APPAREL INC and QUAD GRAPHICS INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
JEFFERSON v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 2:2012cv04610
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. JEFFERSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., PICC and CITY OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Aramark Corp
as 3:2012cv01012
Plaintiff:
Claire B. Newman
Defendant:
Aramark Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-20232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
