Cases 21 - 30 of 65
CATHERINA et al v. ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01549
Plaintiff:
BARBARA CATHERINA and EDWARD J. CATHERINA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE # 1 through #5, ABC CORP #'S 1-5, ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Beckett v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marquis Beckett
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv20638
Defendant:
PAUL LINSNER, ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, IMAN BUNTON and others
Plaintiff:
TROY STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheeran v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC
as 1:2019cv01218
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Sheeran
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivy Frankel v. Aramark Services, inc., et al
as 19-15113
Defendant:
ARAMARK EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES USA INCORPORATED, ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVY FRANKEL
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLCOMB v. ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2018cv00348
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLCOMB
Defendant:
ARAMARK FACILITY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
