Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown v. B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv03022
Defendant:
B.C.D.C. and Aramark Food Company
Plaintiff:
Cody Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Garrison v. Maryland Baltimore Co. BCDC et al
as 1:2020cv02381
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrison
Defendant:
Prime Care Health, Inc., Aramark Food Company and Maryland Baltimore Co. BCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BERRY v. ARAMARK FOOD COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv03651
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD COMPANY, TYE and B. MILLER
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Custis v. Wicomico County Detention Center et al
as 1:2015cv01631
Plaintiff:
Phillip Custis
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center and Aramark Food Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBron v. Aramarck Food Company et al
as 2:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
Orlando LeBron, Sr
Defendant:
Aramark Food Company, R Crowe and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBron v. Aramarck Food Company et al
as 1:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
Orlando LeBron
Defendant:
Aramark Food Company and R Crowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guarneri v. Albany County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Joseph Paul Guarneri
Defendant:
Jerry Jenning, Christopher Clark, Brian I. Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
