Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Wilson v. California State Prison Corcor, et al
as 19-15237
Defendant / Appellee:
PATTEN, Supervising Correctional Cook I, D. OVERLEY, ADA Coordinator, R. TOLSON, Associate Warden Housing and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Wilson v. California State Prison Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
California State Prison Corcoran, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Biter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray et al v. City Of New York, New York
as 1:2016cv08072
Plaintiff:
Murray, Susana Diaz, Candace Radford and others
Defendant:
City Of New York and City Of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perry v. Chaudhary et al
as 0:2015cv03505
Plaintiff:
David Kevin Perry
Defendant:
Arit Chaudhary, Randi Gross and Greenville County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KATSIKIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00576
Plaintiff:
ARITE KATSIKIS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KATSIKIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv06668
Plaintiff:
ARITE KATSIKIS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cao Yong et al v. Robert E. Arit et al
as 2:2009cv01563
Plaintiff:
Cao Yong, Cao Yong, Cao Yong and others
Defendant:
Robert E. Arit and Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Tatum v. McGuiness et al
as 1:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
Willie Tatum
Defendant:
W.J. McGuiness, D.G. Adams, J. Woodford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tatum v. McGuiness et al
as 2:2008cv01400
Plaintiff:
Willie Tatum
Defendant:
W.J. McGuiness, D.G. Adams, J. Woodford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
