Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Cannon v. Biden et al
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Arlen Specter, Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANNON v. COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY et al
as 2:2009cv01627
Plaintiff:
TYRRALL FARROW CANNON
Defendant:
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Obama et al
as 3:2009cv01952
Plaintiff:
Matthew Taylor
Defendant:
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Winningham v. Wake et al
as 7:2009cv02271
Defendant:
Neil V. Wake, John M. Roll, Randy Ely and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Betty Newby v. George Bush
as 08-5469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Betty Ann Newby
Defendant - Appellee:
George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Jenna Bush Hager and others
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01624
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE H. BUSH, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, DICK CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00983
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE H. BUSH, JENNA BUSH HAGER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WISNIEWSKA v. SPECTER et al
as 2:2008cv00423
Plaintiff:
EMILIO WISNIEWSKA
Defendant:
ARLEN SPECTER and JOHN (JAY) ROCKEFELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dumonde, Daniel v. Cong US, et al
as 08-5008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant - Appellee:
Congress of the United States, Artur Davis, Rep., Darlene Drew, Warden and others
DUMONDE v. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2007cv02123
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAFITTE DUMONDE
Defendant:
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, ARTUR DAVIS, DARLENE DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
