Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Armstrong v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01730
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilke v. Driggers et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00349
Defendant:
Jamie Neeley, Mathew M. Baker, Tenesha Whatley and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Ayers Wilke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Armstrong & Associates
as 1:2019cv00036
Plaintiff:
Debbie Weaver
Defendant:
Armstrong & Associates
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2018cv00968
Defendant:
Tami Armstrong, Joann Armstrong, Lawrence Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. CSX Transportation Inc.
as 1:2018cv00409
Plaintiff:
Virgil Armstrong and Ann Neita Armstrong
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong et al v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 2:2018cv00856
Plaintiff:
Virgil Armstrong and Ann Neita Armstrong
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Ann Neita Armstrong and Virgil Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Appelbaum et al v. Conagra Brands Inc
as 2:2018cv00375
Plaintiff:
Stuart Appelbaum , Lenore F Miller , Jack Wurm, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Conagra Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Armstrong v. Woods (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Caitlin Speciality Insurance Co. v. Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv01432
Defendant:
Joseph J. Johnson, Larry Donell Malone, Khloe Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
