Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arthur Holmes v. Debbie Asuncion et al
as 2:2020cv07409
Defendant:
Warden Debbie Asuncion, Associate Warden T. Lewandowski, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. FLECTCHER et al
as 5:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ARTHUR HOLMES
Defendant:
LAURA FLETCHER, GUY YOUNG, MARCUS MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alphonso Dunbar v. Martin O'Malley
as 13-2300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHONSO DUNBAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, JOHN KUO, ARTHUR HOLMES, JR. and others
Dunbar v. O'Malley et al
as 8:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Dunbar
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, John Kuo, Arthur Holmes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Governor Martin O'Malley, Lt. Gov Anthony G. Brown, Hon. Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02371
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
