Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Arthur Wright v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv00843
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Valentina O'Connor v. Arthur Wright, et al
as 19-1253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINA L. O'CONNOR, as next friend and guardian of Michael W. O'Connor
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HERRERA, Deputy Star No. 11369, an individual, CHRISTINE ELLMAN, Officer, ARTHUR WRIGHT, Deputy Star No. 10552, an individual and others
Wright v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00197
Petitioner:
Lemarcus Arthur Wright
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Lemarcus Wright
as 15-3237
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Lemarcus Arthur Wright
O'Connor v. Wright et al
as 1:2015cv08066
Plaintiff:
Valentina L O'Connor
Defendant:
Arthur Wright , T. Merriweather , J. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06728
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 Through 10 and John Laurie
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Huptich et al
as 2:2012cv01130
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Wright
Defendant:
David Huptich and William Elfritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Wright v. Gardena Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv07173
Defendant:
Does, Gardena Police Department, Chief Edward Medrano and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wright
Arce v. Deputy Sheriff Arthur Wright #10552 et al
as 1:2011cv02480
Plaintiff:
Michael Arce
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Arthur Wright #10552 , Deputy Sheriff Thomas Dougherty # 11355 and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
